Forum
Välkommen till Eventors forum! Här kan du diskutera Eventor tillsammans med SOFT:s Eventor-ansvariga, utvecklare och andra Eventor-användare. Forumet består av ett antal kategorier, som i sin tur innehåller ämnesbaserade trådar. Du behöver vara inloggad för att skapa trådar och skriva inlägg i forumet.
Supporthjälp
Forumet är i första hand avsett för diskussion mellan användare. Har du en supportfråga, besök vår frågor och svar-sida eller kontakta supporten.
Kategorier
-
Trådar för allmän diskussion om Eventor.
-
Trådar som handlar om felsökning. Kom ihåg att bifoga en noggrann beskrivning av felet inklusive hur man går tillväga för att upprepa det samt relevanta felmeddelanden, så ökar chansen att du får hjälp!
-
Trådar som beskriver funktioner som du saknar i Eventor.
-
Trådar för diskussion om OLA, Svenska Orienteringsförbundets tävlingsadministrativa system.
-
Trådar för diskussion om Sverigelistan.
Senaste 10 inläggen
-
i dag klockan 10:44
Hi colleagues, I have a question about version control system statistics for 2024. I actively use Git, but increasingly I hear about other systems such as Mercurial and Subversion. I would like to know how the preference between these systems is distributed in the development community, especially among large projects. Is there any recent data or research on this topic? I would also be interested in how exactly these systems affect the productivity of teams. Maybe someone has experience switching from one system to another? Please share!
-
i dag klockan 1:03
This is a very interesting question and I'm glad you brought it up. The version control systems statistics, Git continues to be the most popular choice among developers in 2024, and this can be explained by several factors. First, Git offers powerful branching capabilities, which is especially important for teams working on Agile and DevOps methodologies. According to a study conducted earlier this year, more than 70% of surveyed developers preferred Git for their projects, which confirms its leading position. However, it's worth noting that systems such as Mercurial and Subversion also have their own audiences. Mercurial, although less popular, attracts attention due to its simplicity and ease of use. There are projects that have successfully used Mercurial due to its more straightforward approach. For example, some teams in large companies have noted that for their specific processes, Mercurial proves to be more intuitive. Subversion, on the other hand, is still heavily used in organizations where version control is needed for large binary files, such as in game or video development. Here it is important to realize that the choice of version control system often depends not only on personal preference, but also on the requirements of the project.
-
i går klockan 21:36
I've also heard that Git remains at the top of the list, which makes sense given its functionality. I agree that switching to a new system can be difficult, but in the long run it can improve workflows. For example, in my project we use Git and we haven't had any major problems training new team members. If any of you haven't tried other systems yet, be sure to share your experiences, it can be helpful!
-
i går klockan 21:34
<a href="https://llcbuddy.com/data/arizona-child-abuse-statistics/" rel="dofollow">arizona child abuse statistics</a>
-
i går klockan 21:34
https://llcbuddy.com/data/version-control-systems-statistics/
-
i går klockan 21:31
<a href=https://llcbuddy.com/data/version-control-systems-statistics>4566456</a>
-
i går klockan 21:31
[url=https://llcbuddy.com/data/version-control-systems-statistics/]version control systems statistics[/url]